Tuesday, February 17, 2015

The Romantic Label (Part 3)

All the (arduous) (tender) (pornographic) affections the couple exhibited on the trolley got me thinking about our culture’s clichéd notions of romance. While this list isn’t exhaustive, I think it hits on a few key actions of those people who are dubbed “romantics.”

1.      Gift-giving, including flowers, chocolates, and teddy bears.
2.      Personal displays of affection, not to exclude hand-holding, hugging, kissing, potential grinding, and ass-grabbing;
3.      Cuddling. Lots and lots of cuddling;
4.      Overblown, creative proposals with fireworks, messages in the sky, etc.;
5.      Cooking a romantic meal, complete with hearty wine and thick lasagna;
6.      Flirting. Lots and lots and lots of flirting, with sexual innuendos and coy hints

If I were to rank how romantic I am based on the above banal clichés, I’d be on the bottom rung. My personality and mindset just aren’t compatible with romantic gestures.  Flowers, for example, belong in the ground, not in a vase on a table where they suffocate from lack of nutrients. Chocolate, like much of my Halloween candy over the years, either sits in a bag forever, or gets offered to my mom; eating it just doesn’t interest me, so why should I buy it? I want to skewer Valentine’s Day balloons with a harpoon, not because I’m “anti-love” but because I’m “anti-greeting card holidays.” Gift-giving, though nice, sends the wrong message. I don’t want to buy your love; I want you to love my personality (and body), not my wallet. If you have to buy gifts to get your significant other to pay attention to you, they’re not worth it.
      Though I’m not someone who sneers at couples kissing in public, personal displays of affection that resemble heavy petting will never be tolerated by me. That should be done behind closed doors, not in view of anyone. A man with political aspirations has to be mindful of what others’ think (to an extent).
For another of my romantic problems, we go to my bedroom. My sleep form resembles that of a dead man. I lie on my back, arms folded over one another. It is the furthest thing from romantic, and it definitely doesn’t solicit a cuddle. I get a good night’s sleep from it, and if I were to sleep on my side, I’d wake up cranky and sore. Let’s just say I’m getting practice for when I’m in a coffin.
Because I am such a literal person, I also don’t get hints. At all. “Do you want to watch a movie?” means “Do you want to watch a movie?” to me, not “I don’t want to watch a movie,” or “I want to watch a movie while I stick my tongue down your throat.”
For a literary fanatic, I take words at face value quite frequently, like “Can you drive with one hand?” “Of course I can,” I’ll say, “Man, what a stupid question.” Yup, instead of being cute, you’ll just have to ask to hold my hand.
            Really, the only criterion from above which could give me an edge in my ranking of romantics is the cooking. I’m not a gourmet chef, but I try, which I guess is adorable. Of course, dropping out of culinary school takes that down a notch.

            Taking into account my inability (or outright refusal) to conform to romantic labels in my personal life, it comes as no surprise that romance in my writing is lackluster and dull. Most love stories end up half-written, banished to the “Unfinished” folder on my desktop. Though, there was one romance I did finish…as a homicide.
            My first, and most “successful” love story was written in 2009 for a freshman-level creative writing course. New Year’s Eve was everything a hardcore romantic cliché reader would want, except for sex and a cover with a hunky, shirtless man on it. Filled with a plethora of pretty words, it told the story of a young man and the nerves he felt minutes before he was to propose to his girlfriend. Our love-struck main character sent a message to his girlfriend to meet him in the dining room of the cruise ship they were staying on, but panic set in when he couldn’t find her there! Oh, no! What will he do? He hurried out on deck and, just as the clock struck midnight, he slid down onto one knee in front of her. Fireworks erupted in a display of sheer magic. She said yes, and they both embraced as nearby passengers clapped and cheered.
            How romantic! How beautiful! How utterly awful and boring!
            At the time, I was incredibly proud of my story, and why shouldn’t I be? It was my first time delving into the subject, and my classmates enjoyed it. One girl absolutely gushed over everything about it. I remember her commandeering the workshop discussion, pointing out how poetic and beautiful and lovely and amazing it was. Her face became flushed as she continued to elaborate on how ingenious it was for me to compare the main character’s love for the girl to a puzzle that was missing one key piece to completion.
            My head swelled. I am so romantic! I’m a stud-muffin, for sure, I thought.
That story was the last time I really explored love, aside from the tale that ended up being a love-turned-horror story. I diverted my attention to satire and realism instead. What I lacked in romance, I made up for in writing about bleak, depressing real-life.
Of course, my lack of writing in the subject of love and romance doesn’t mean I want to be a bachelor my entire life, or that I’m disinterested.
You see, one day I’d love (pun intended) to craft a love story, not one with the conventional guy-loses-girl, gets-girl-back cliché, or any of that nonsense. This love story won’t have a New Year’s Eve kiss, a firework proposal, or what could be construed as sexual acts on public transportation. Nope, I have my eye on writing a love story that emulates the relationship of the two men I saw on that trolley one summer in Laguna Beach, one in which love is developed from years of strong friendship, complimented by soulful glances and gentle hand-holding. That’s the story I want to write.

Maybe if I’m lucky, I’ll get to experience it, too.


No comments:

Post a Comment